The evolution of information of nanotechnology and synthetic biology found initially in the C19 vials and then in human blood. The self-assembly of hydrogel filaments was the key findings of research done with Clifford Carnicom.
Vaccines Must Be Stopped Immediately!
Image: Massive Amounts of Hydrogel Building spheres in blood
I have been seeing in many people a concerning trend of accelerated self assembly in C19 un-injected blood. I have seen even worse than this in many people.
Hydrogel can replace any organ, including the immune system as Karen Kingston showed in the patents.
Alarming New Report from Working Group of Vaccine Analysis in Germany and Other Countries
ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD 09.08.2022
From the report:
The COVID-19 vaccination programs must be stopped immediately
The German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis has made its initial findings publicly available in a wide-ranging report:
- Toxic substances were found in all of the samples of COVID-19 vaccines – without exception.
- The blood samples of all the people who had been vaccinated showed marked changes.
- The greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent are vaccine side effects.
- In all samples of COVID-19 vaccines, without exception, components were found, using several methods of measurement, that: – are, in the quantities found, toxic according to medical guidelines, – had not been declared by the manufacturers as present in the vaccines, – are for the most part metallic, – are visible under the dark-field microscope as distinctive and complex structures of different sizes, – can only partially be explained as a result of crystallization or decomposition processes, – cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process.
- The comparison of blood samples from unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals by means of dark-field microscopy showed noticeable changes in the blood of each person who had been vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccines. This was evident even if those people hadn’t at that point displayed any visible reaction to the vaccinations. Complex structures similar to those in the vaccines were found in the blood samples of the vaccinated. Using artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis, the difference between the blood of vaccinated and unvaccinated people was confirmed.
- The stability of the lipid nanoparticle envelope is closely correlated with the incidence of vaccine side effects and injury. The more stable this envelope, the greater the amount of mRNA that penetrates cells, where the production of spike proteins then takes place. These results correspond with the findings of pathologists who have carried out autopsies on people who died due to vaccine injury. Spike proteins were detected in damaged tissue. Researchers suspect that the spike protein is, in itself, is toxic.
Please look at this extensive research and excellent documentation here:
The following predominantly metallic elements were unexpectedly detected in the doses from AstraZeneca, BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna:
• Alkali metals: caesium (Cs), potassium (K),
• Alkaline earth metals: calcium (Ca), barium (Ba),
• transition metals: cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), titanium (Ti),
• Rare earth metals: cerium (Ce), gadolinium (Gd),
• Mining group/metal: aluminium (Al),
• Carbon group: silicon (Si) (partly support material/slide),
• Oxygen group: sulphur (S)
Here is another researcher who found nanostructures:
Further scientific evidence of nanostructures in Pfizer vials from New Zealand
Dr. Daniel Nagase discusses in this video the mass spectroscopy that did not identify any Phosphorous or Nitrogen in the sample. This means there was no elements related to life, that constitute molecules like RNA, DNA or proteins.
Please click on this link:
Covid vaccines show no elements of life
Here is an article about his findings:
Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Covid Injections
Here are extensive documentation of vaccinated patients nanoparticles in the blood of vaccinated people from Italy:
CONTRAST PHASE MICROSCOPE ANALYSIS ON THE BLOOD OF 1006 SYMPTOMATIC SUBJECTS AFTER ANTI-COVID VACCINATION WITH PFIZER/BIONTECH OR MODERNA
1.98MB ∙ PDF file
As a physician, I am horrified by this information. I want everyone in the world to see this, this is not normal. This is undeniable evidence. The vaccines must be stopped. This is being injected into children. This is being injected into good people who know nothing about the diabolical agenda behind the shots. There is so much irrefutable information now, and all responsible need to be held accountable. Read this. Look at it. This was injected into 68% of the world population.
The Quantum dot video is not audible well, here is the link to it:
In this video, I review the systematic evidence of the nanotechnology in the C19 shots, the darkfield live blood findings, the research with Clifford Carnicom and my findings and documentation of the mechanism of self- assembly hydrogel filaments and blood toxicity. This phenomenon has been increasing in the level of contamination of the blood, the ill health effects from bioweapon shedding and environmental contamination.
According to Celeste Solum, who participated in an US Army Military Workshop in 2018 on Transhumanism, the US Army was predicting that by 2025 no natural humans would exist. Since my research is on unvaccinated C19 blood to alert the world of the de facto evidence of shedding, it is my conviction that we are dangerously close to fulfilling the goal of this transhumanist agenda.
“Transhumanism is the technology suite, I think, is the best way to put it, around the idea of the both mechanical and biological modification of humans. The RNA (mRNA)vaccines as an entry point (to transhumanism).”
Dr. Robert Malone
mRNA ‘Vaccines’ are the Gateway to Transhumanism, per Dr. Malone
In a recent interview with Glenn Beck, Dr. Robert Malone describes mRNA ‚vaccines‘ as the entry point for the suite of technologies that can modify humans through forced biological and mechanical genetic mutations. This is also known as transhumanism or Directed Evolution.
Dr. Malone rightfully earned the title of Inventor of mRNA Vaccine Technology per Dr. Malone’s websitewhere he lists his major publications and patents contributing to the invention of mRNA Vaccine Technology (which is nanotechnology) including Dr. Malone’s 1989 publication, “Cationic Liposome – Mediated RNA Transfection.”
You can watch the clip here as well.
During the interview, Dr. Malone explains how the mRNA (RNA) ‘vaccines’ are the ‘ethical entry’ point to transhumanism. Dr. Malone describes transhumanism as the suite of nanotechnologies used to force or direct the the evolution of humans with non-human DNA and inorganic material (such as metallic-based electromagnetic molecules).
In a recent Yahoo! Finance article, Elon Musk says that humanoids will eventually outnumber humans (homo sapiens) resulting in devastating economic impact.
Bloomberg | Billionaire Peter Thiel Backs Fundraiser of Brain-Computer Firm | Media | Blackrock Neurotech
Introducing The BCI Exhibit | Media, Press Release | Blackrock Neurotech
Experimentation on Innocent Children and Adults with Gene-Editing Nanotech Under the Guise of ‘mRNA Vaccines’ is NOT Ethical
Electronic Nanoparticles are Not Lipids, They’re Nanotechnology
Per the paper’s abstract, Dr. Malone and two of his colleagues, “developed an efficient and reproducible method for RNA transfection, using a synthetic cationic lipid, incorporated into a liposome (lipofectin).”
BTW- a synthetic substance that carries an electronic charge is NOT a lipid. It’s a nanotechnology/electronic device. Being injected with lipids just sounds a heck of a lot better than being injected with electronic nanotechnologies. We were told electronic nanotechnologies are lipid encapsulated mRNA vaccines because no one in their right mind would agree to be injected with an electronic nanotechnology device.
Have Cationic Liposomes Ever Been Considered a Nanotechnology?
According to the December 2020 paper, Nanomedicine for COVID-19: The Role of Nanotechnology and Diagnosis of COVID-19, liposomes were considered nanotechnologies/(nano-medicine delivery devices) per the FDA’s 2007 Nanotechnology Task Force Report.
What is the Purpose of Cationic Nanotechnology?
Cationic means that the nanotechnology independently hosts a positive electronic charge (because after all technology that doesn’t host electricity on its own is just…a piece of metal-like material? Anyway…) Per the 1996 patent Delivery of Exogenous DNA Sequences in a Mammal, the purpose of the mRNA cationic nanotechnology was to produce non-mammal DNA (or non-human DNA) in a mammal (or a human). Non-mammal DNA could include DNA from reptiles, insects, or other non-vertebrae species.
Per ThermoFisher’s website, cationic lipids are gene-editing nanotechnologies used to deliver DNA and silencing RNA (siRNA) into cells.
ThermoFisher’s website further explains how the cationic liposome gene-editing nanotechnologies release encoded foreign genetic material into a cell’s nucleus so the cell then can produce or express foreign genetic material.
How has Human Research with Nanotechnologies Been Allowed under the FDA and NIH Regulations?
Nanotechnologies have been researched and developed under the guise of cancer research and for the ‘treatment’ of rare autoimmune diseases. Because research subjects were often only given days or weeks left to live, the fact that mRNA nanotechnologies genetically alter the cells of the human body to ‘attack self’ and to adsorb inorganic genetic material (i.e. metals or reptilian toxins) into the cytoplasm or nucleus of human cells often resulting in new autoimmune diseases (some of which have near-term disabling or lethal consequences) went unnoticed as human subjects were often already disabled and at a high-risk for near-term death.
Per ThermoFisher’s website, Lipofectin is the reagent of choice to integrate foreign DNA and RNA into endothelial cells. Endothelial cells are the cells that line our blood vessels, lymph nodes, and heart.
Lipofectin is Used to Integrate the Genetic Sequences of Aggressive Cancer into Humanized Cells
Lipofectin is also very effective at successfully integrating HeLa (the mRNA codes for the most aggressive form of cancer known to man) into human cells to produce cancer inside a (human).
Lipofectin is Used to Integrate the Genetic Sequences of Aggressive Cancer into Humanized Cells
Lipofectin is also very effective at successfully integrating HeLa (the mRNA codes for the most aggressive form of cancer known to man) into human cells to produce cancer inside a mammal (human).
Per the 1996 patent that Dr. Malone is listed as an inventor of, Delivery of Exogenous DNA Sequences in a Mammal, the cationic liposome nanotechnologies can deliver payloads of non-mammal toxic peptides to human cells, such as the bioweapon ricin or cobra snake venom.
When doctors at the University of Pittsburgh tested the respiratory fluid from eight (8) patients who died from severe COVID-19 in 2020 in Lombardy, Italy, they found that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contained synthetically recreated cobra venom, Krait venom, rabies virus, and HIV glycoprotein-120.
The Superantigen (SAg) spike protein, known as the Wuhan-Hu-1 S-2P, is programmed to be produced by cells in the human body by the mRNA found in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine COMIRNATY.
According to the 2021 published paper on nanotechnology, it appears that the cationic liposomes, SARS mRNA sequences (SARS-1, MERS, SARS-2), and the lipid nanoparticles are not only found in the COVID-19 injections, but also are also the COVID-19 ‘virus itself’ with an mRNA program file size of 30kb and nanoparticle delivery vehicle diameter of 60-140nm. This means the nanotechnology in the ‘vaccines’ is the same nanotechnology that caused the pandemics and public health emergencies.
Nanoparticles Were Used in Past Respiratory Viruses
Alarmingly, the University of California San Diego and LaJolla mRNA nanotechnology experts claim, “….previous nanoparticles…were used in respiratory viruses have approximately similar sizes.”
The authors make it clear that they are not speaking of naturally occurring pathogens (or viruses) when they are referring to ‘previously used nanotechnologies that caused pandemic viruses.’ The authors write that the nanoparticles include, “self-assembling proteins and peptide-based nanoparticles; 15nm; and inorganic (inorganic=not from nature = synthetic) nanoparticles: 100nm.”
mRNA Vaccine Technology and “Respiratory Pandemic Technology” are the SAME Nanoparticle Technologies
The cationic nanotechnologies that cause viral pandemics, such as COVID-19, are the same “100nm…self-assembling proteins and nanoparticle technologies” found in the COVID-19 injections (per the mRNA vaccine patents, manufacturer websites, and FDA filings).
The ‘mRNA vaccine’ LNP nanotechnologies are the bioweapons that caused many people to become ill in Wuhan and around the world in 2020 which is confirmed by EcoHealth Alliance’s 2018 pitch to DARPA.
The concept of the invention of “mRNA vaccine technology” is a misnomer and a sham. The term ‘mRNA vaccine’ is a cover for nanotechnologies that are being used as gene-editing technologies and agents of biowarfare on US and global citizens.
The cationic liposome nanotechnologies are being used to introduce non-human DNA into the cells of adults and children to turn their cells into disease-causing, toxic spike-protein bioweapon factories.
When the harmful gene-editing nanotechnologies were launched, we were told that the science was too complicated to understand. That was a lie. The science was hidden from the American people because if we were given the patents, peer-review publications and FDA submitted data, it is clear that that ‘mRNA vaccines’ are bioweapons that can only cause disease, disabilities and death.
Trust the Experts
We were told to simply trust the science and the experts. Unfortunately, nearly none of the experts have been honest with the American people. If I was able to figure out in May of 2021 that mRNA Vaccine Lipid Nanoparticles were bioweapons by reading ONE PATENT, how come the inventor of the ‘mRNA vaccine’ cationic liposome nanotechnology still has not figured this out?
“Attached please find the global patent for the mRNA lipid nanoparticle (LNP) vaccines. I believe they will conclude that the COVID-19 vaccines are bioweapons under the guise of mRNA therapeutic vaccines….Per the patent, the LNPs can target specific organs and systems throughout the body, including, but not limited to reproductive, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and the central nervous system, specifically crossing the blood brain barrier.”
Karen Kingston, May 2021
Why are experts referring to the nanotechnology bioweapons as ‘mRNA vaccines’ and starkly avoiding the term nanotechnology?
If Pfizer and Moderna have no problem plastering the term technology (nanotechnology) all over their websites, why are our trusted leaders accusing folks like me and Dr. Ana Mihalcea of being part of the ‘deep state’ or ‘not credible’ for pointing out that that the COVID-19 injections contain gene-editing nanotechnologies?
Pfizer
‘mRNA vaccine’ is a misnomer. No one was injected with a ‘biological lipid’ or ‘mRNA vaccine.’ Pfizer doesn’t even refer to their mRNA gene-editing technology as a therapy, because mRNA is NOT a therapy. mRNA technology is a harmful and deadly bioweapon platform for purposes of transhumanism that’s been to sold to global civilians as ‘vaccine technology.’
More than 265 million Americans were injected with gene-editing nanotechnology as part of the largest criminal human experiment in the history of mankind. This is biowarfare.
Are Trusted Experts Invested in Humanity or Transhumanism?
Big Pharma, biotech, and other organizations and individuals who are invested in this gene-editing nanotechnology refer to this demonic invention as ‘mRNA vaccines’ or gene therapies only because no one would have ever agreed otherwise to be ‘vaccinated’ if they were told that the shots contained gene-editing nanotechnologies.
If one credible mRNA expert would be honest with the American people and tell the world that they were NOT injected with an ‘mRNA vaccine’, but that they were injected with a gene-editing bioweapon nanotechnologies intended to injure and harm them, I believe humanity would wake up to the fact that we were all unknowingly forced into the largest criminal human experiment ever conducted in the history of mankind.
A Fulbright scholar, Dr. Giordano was awarded the JW Fulbright Visiting Professorship at the Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, GER, and currently is Distinguished Visiting Professor of Biotechnology, Health Promotions, and Ethics at the Coburg University of Applied Sciences, Coburg, GER. He was previously an International Fellow of the Centre for Neuroethics at the University of Oxford, UK.
Prof. Giordano is the author of over 300 papers, 7 books, 21 book chapters, and 25 government white papers on brain science, national defense and ethics. His book, Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns (2015, CRC Press) is widely regarded and used as a definitive work on the topic. Prof. Giordano is a former US Naval officer, holding designations as an aerospace physiologist, research physiologist, and research psychologist, and served with the US Navy and Marine Corps. In recognition of his achievements he was elected to the European Academy of Science and Arts, and named an Overseas Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine (UK).
The Kingston Report. TRUTH WINS.
Per Dr. Malone’s 1989 clinical publication, he used Lipofectin to penetrate mammalian cells in order to have the cells of mice express the DNA from from the traditional Northeastern firefly, African clawed frog, and fruit fly.
I hate to break it to the inventors of mRNA ‘vaccine’ technologies, including Dr. Malone, who believe that when they are falsely representing gene-editing nanotechnologies that are being used for the purposes of forcibly directing the evolution of humans to merge with digital technologies and express DNA from insects and reptiles, this is not ethical. mRNA ‘vaccines’ are grossly unethical, demonic in nature, and an act of global biowarfare.
Oddly, the most hard-hitting article I came across was this bizarre ‘autobiographical’ yet shockingly accurate blog, “Confessions of an Engineered Nanoparticle.”
I struggled with whether or not to summarize this ‘autobiography’ in a clear and snappy fashion or to re-write it in a scientific and well-referenced format. (Even though the article is clearly written by a nanotechnology expert). For the past few days, my mind and my heart have been unable to take on this task. So here, unadulterated and unedited (but with references, imagery and links to related articles from the Kingston Report added) is “Confessions of an Engineered Nanoparticle;” by Mark Tokarski.
Mark Tokarski’s FREE blog can be found here.
1. GRAPHENE/NANOTECHNOLOGY IN MASKS
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088662/#CR24
Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms – PMC (nih.gov)
The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals.
Twenty-four hours after intranasal administration, a weak radiation signal was detectable in the region of the brain corresponding to the olfactory bulb in mice administered s-GO-DOTA, us-GO-DOTA, or DOTA. (…)The results indicated that us-GO [ultra-small- [us] GO ] was present in all of the brain regions; s-GO in the olfactory bulbs, pons, medulla, and cerebellum; and l-GO in the olfactory bulbs, pons, and medulla. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386420301879 Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets – ScienceDirect)
https://www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnology-news2/newsid=58745.php Nanofiber face masks improve filtration efficiency, need replacing more often (w/video)
https://recalls-rappels.canada.ca/en/alert-recall/graphene-face-masks
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2018/NR/C8NR04950E
Occupational exposure to graphene based nanomaterials: risk assessment – Nanoscale (RSC Publishing) The few in vivo inhalation toxicity studies (limited to 5-days of repeated exposure and only one to 5 days per week for 4 weeks) indicate inflammatory/fibrotic effects at the pulmonary level, not always reversible after 14/90 days.
Currently, the daily production of 60 disposable face masks has been over 3 million, and the KN95 production can be reached 5 million. We also have FFP2, FFP3, Disposable Medical Face Mask, Isolation Gown and disposable face mask for children, etc.
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2016/py/c6py00639f/unauth
https://medium.com/edge-of-innovation/how-safe-are-graphene-based-face-masks-b88740547e8c
How toxic is graphene?
Early concerns around graphene were sparked by previous research on another form of carbon — carbon nanotubes. It turns out that some forms of these fiber-like materials can cause serious harm if inhaled.
https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/graphene-slips-deeper-into-lungs-than-predicted/3001864.article
…
- GRAPHENE/NANOTECHNOLOGY IN PCR TESTS https://www.nature.com/articles/am20137#MOESM2 Biodistribution and pulmonary toxicity of intratracheally instilled graphene oxide in mice | NPG Asia Materials (nature.com) | Abstract Graphene and its derivatives (for example, nanoscale graphene oxide (NGO)) have emerged as extremely attractive nanomaterials for a wide range of applications, including diagnostics and therapeutics. In this work, we present a systematic study on the in vivo distribution and pulmonary toxicity of NGO for up to 3 months after exposure. Radioisotope tracing and morphological observation demonstrated that intratracheally instilled NGO was mainly retained in the lung. NGO could result in acute lung injury (ALI) and chronic pulmonary fibrosis. Such NGO-induced ALI was related to oxidative stress and could effectively be relieved with dexamethasone treatment. In addition, we found that the biodistribution of 125I-NGO varied greatly from that of 125I ions, hence it is possible that nanoparticulates could deliver radioactive isotopes deep into the lung, which might settle in numerous ‘hot spots’ that could result in mutations and cancers, raising environmental concerns about the large-scale production of graphene oxide.
https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=37676
Using a Graphene-Based Electrochemical Sensor to Detect COVID-19 in Under Five Minutes (azonano.com)
https://www.nsmedicaldevices.com/news/graphene-sensor-covid-19-test/
https://outraged.substack.com/p/bill-gates-is-a-pcr-test-fortune
https://rumble.com/vo8v3f-nasal-swabs-for-pcr-tests-are-higly-dangerous-.html
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1403570/000149315221010243/form10-q.htm#V_009
- GRAPHENE/NANOTECHNOLOGY IN VENTILATOR FILTERS https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/326610 Graphene air filter traps and kills bacteria (medicalnewstoday.com). They (scientists) envisage the device being useful in hospitals and other healthcare settings.
3. GRAPHENE/NANOTECHNOLOGY IN FLU SHOTS AND IN “COVID-19” “VACCINES“
https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphene-trust-the-science
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577996/
Nanotechnology in Vaccines https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3070
Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity. – Abstract – Europe PMC https://europepmc.org/article/med/26814441
…
THIS NANOTECHNOLOGY, THIS GRAPHENE IS EXTREMELY TOXIC AND DEADLY.
JULIMINATION 
Hinterlasse einen Kommentar