BREAKING! WHO Calls for Global Police to Arrest Journalists Who Speak out Against Pandemic Policies

Tedros claims all nation must unite under a global policy and with global force against their common enemy for the next pandemic.

In a session titled “Disease X,” WHO Director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared that in order to be “better prepared” and “to understand disease X,” the WHO’s legally binding ‘Pandemic Agreement’ needs to be adopted by leaders worldwide.

“This is about a common enemy,” Tedros said, adding “without a shared response, we will face the same problem as COVID.”

He explained that the deadline for the legislation is May of this year and member states are negotiating between countries to implement it.

“This is a common global interest, and very narrow national interests should not come in the way,” he continued, adding “of course national interests are natural, but they could be difficult and affect the negotiations.”

This is the WHO’s last desperate attempt for a global power grab and they’re calling for desperate measures. If we allow a global power to make freedom a speech an international crime, that is the end of our Constitutional Republic.

Here is the full exchange:

Do you know that the real reason for the connection between the Sex offenders Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwell, Gates, the WEF and the Elits isnt only the mad Sex-Trafficing-Ring and Money, It’s Science, Computing, Healthcare, DNA, AI, Data-Mining, Power and Control.


A Tale Of Two Bills

It is worth exploring the ties between the “philanthropic” endeavors of Bill Gates and Bill Clinton in the early 2000s, particularly given Epstein’s and Ghislaine Maxwell’s ties to the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative during that period. According to former Israeli intelligence operative Ari Ben-Menashe, Bill Clinton had been the main focus of Epstein’s sexual blackmail operation in the 1990s, a claim supported by Epstein victim testimony and Epstein’s intimate involvement with individuals who were close to the former president at the time.

Bill Gates at the White House Conference
on the New Economy in 2000
Source: LA Times

Despite tensions arising from the Clinton administration’s pursuit of Microsoft’s monopoly in the late 1990s, the Gates and Clinton relationship had thawed by April 2000, when Gates attended the White House “Conference on the New Economy.” Attendees besides Gates included close Epstein associate Lynn Forester (now Lady de Rothschild) and then secretary of the treasury Larry Summers, who has also come under fire for his Epstein ties. Another attendee was White House chief of staff Thomas “Mack” McLarty, whose special assistant Mark Middleton met with Epstein at least three times at the Clinton White House. Middleton was fired after press reports surfaced detailing his ties to illegal donations linked to foreign governments that had been made to Clinton’s 1996 re-election campaign. Another participant in the conference was Janet Yellen, Biden’s current Secretary of the Treasury.

Gates spoke at a conference panel entitled “Closing the Global Divide: Health, Education and Technology.” He discussed how the mapping of the human genome would result in a new era of technological breakthroughs and discussed the need to offer internet access to everyone to close the digital divide and allow the “new” internet-based economy to take shape. At the time, Gates was backing a company, along with American Telecom billionaire Craig McCaw, that hoped to establish a global internet service provider monopoly through a network of low-orbit satellites. That company, Teledesic, shut down between 2002 and 2003 and is credited as being the inspiration for Elon Musk’s Starlink.

Bill Clinton and Bill Gates entered the world of philanthropy around the same time, with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation launching in 2000 and the Clinton Foundation, in 2001. Not only that but Wired described the two foundations as being “at the forefront of a new era in philanthropy, in which decisions—often referred to as investments—are made with the strategic precision demanded of business and government, then painstakingly tracked to gauge their success.”

Other media outlets, however, such as the Huffington Post, challenged that these foundations engaged in “philanthropy” and asserted that calling them such was causing “the rapid deconstruction of the accepted term.” The Huffington Post further noted that the Clinton Global Initiative (part of the Clinton Foundation), the Gates Foundation, and a few similar organizations “all point in the direction of blurring the boundaries between philanthropy, business and non-profits.” It noted that this model for “philanthropy” has been promoted by the World Economic Forum and the Milken Institute. It is also worth noting that several of Epstein’s own “philanthropic” vehicles were also created just as this new era in philanthropy was beginning.

The Milken Institute was founded by Michael Milken, the notorious Wall Street “junk bond king,” who was indicted on 98 counts of racketeering and securities fraud in 1989. He served little prison time and was ultimately pardoned by Donald Trump. Milken committed his crimes while working alongside Leon Black and Ron Perelman at Drexel Burnham Lambert before its scandalous collapse. Black was deeply tied to Epstein, even having Epstein manage his personal “philanthropic” foundation for several years, even after Epstein’s first arrest. Perelman was a major Clinton donor whose 1995 fundraiser for the then president was attended by Epstein and whose companies offered jobs to Webster Hubbell and Monica Lewinsky after their respective scandals in the Clinton administration. Like Gates, Milken has transformed his reputation for ruthlessness in the corporate world into one of a “prominent philanthropist.” Much of his “philanthropy” benefits the Israeli military and illegal Israeli settlements in occupied Palestine.

Years after creating their foundations, Gates and Clinton discussed how they have “long bonded over their shared mission” of normalizing this new model of philanthropy. Gates spoke to Wired in 2013 about “their forays into developing regions” and “cites the close partnerships between their organizations.” In that interview, Gates revealed that he had met Clinton before he had become president, stating, “I knew him before he was president, I knew him when he was president, and I know him now that he’s not president.”

Also in that interview, Clinton stated that after he left the White House he sought to focus on two specific things. The first is the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), which he stated exists “thanks largely to funding from the Gates Foundation,” and the second is the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), “where I try to build a global network of people to do their own thing.”

The Clinton Health Access Initiative first received an $11 million donation from the Gates Foundation in 2009. Over the last twelve years, the Gates Foundation has donated more than $497 million to CHAI. CHAI was initially founded in 2002 with the mission of tackling HIV/AIDS globally through “strong government relationships” and addressing “market inefficiencies.” The Gates Foundation’s significant donations, however, began not long after CHAI’s expansion into malaria diagnostics and treatments. Notably, in 2011, Tachi Yamada, the former president of the Gates Foundation’s Global Health program, joined CHAI’s board alongside Chelsea Clinton.

Bill Gates and Bill Clinton at the annual Clinton Global Initiative in 2010

Regarding the CGI, Epstein’s defense lawyers argued in court in 2007 that Epstein had been “part of the original group that conceived of the Clinton Global Initiative,” which was first launched in 2005. Epstein’s lawyers described the CGI as a project “bringing together a community of global leaders to devise and implement innovative solutions to some of the world’s most pressing challenges.” The Gates Foundation gave the CGI a total of $2.5 million between 2012 and 2013 in addition to its massive donations to the CHAI and an additional $35 million to the Clinton Foundation itself. In addition to the Gates Foundation donations, Gates’s Microsoft has been intimately involved in other “philanthropic” projects backed by Clinton.

In addition to these ties, Hillary Clinton established a partnership between the Clinton Foundation and the Gates Foundation in 2014 as part of the Clintons’ No Ceilings initiative. That partnership sought to “gather and analyze data about the status of women and girls’ participation around the world” and involved the two foundations working “with leading technology partners to collect these data and compile them.” Months before the partnership was announced, Gates and Epstein met for dinner and discussed the Gates Foundation and philanthropy, according to the New York Times. During Hillary Clinton’s unsuccessful run for president in 2016, both Bill and Melinda Gates were on her short list as potential options for vice president.

In addition, Epstein attempted to become involved in the Gates Foundation directly, as seen by his efforts to convince the Gates Foundation to partner with JP Morgan on a multibillion-dollar “global health charitable fund” that would have resulted in hefty fees paid out to Epstein, who was very involved with JP Morgan at the time. Though that fund never materialized, Epstein and Gates did discuss Epstein becoming involved in Gates’s philanthropic efforts. Some of these contacts were not reported by the mainstream press until after the Bill and Melinda Gates divorce announcement. Yet, as mentioned, it was known that Epstein had “directed” Gates to donate to at least one organization—$2 million in 2014 to the MIT Media Lab.

Recent revelations about Gates and Epstein meetings that took place between 2013 and 2014 have further underscored the importance Epstein apparently held in the world of billionaire “philanthropy,” with Gates reportedly claiming that Epstein was his “ticket” to winning a Nobel Prize. Norwegian media, however, reported in October 2020 that Gates and Epstein had met the Nobel Committee chair, which failed to make a splash in international media at the time. It is worth asking if Epstein managed to arrange such meetings with other individuals who also coveted Nobel Prizes and if any such individuals later received those prizes. If Epstein had such connections, it is unlikely that he would use them only once in the case of Bill Gates, given the vastness of his network, particularly in the tech and science worlds.

Indeed, 2013 was also the year that the Gates mansion systems engineer, Rick Allen Jones, began to be investigated by Seattle police for his child porn and child rape collection, which contained over six thousand images and videos. Despite the gravity of his crime, when Jones was arrested at the Gates mansion a year later, he was not jailed after his arrest but was merely ordered “to stay away from children,” according to local media reports. From Melinda’s perspective, this scandal, combined with Bill Gates’s growing association with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein may have posed a threat to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s reputation, well before Epstein’s 2019 arrest.

2013 was also the year that the Maxwells become involved in the Clinton Foundation. That year, Ghislaine Maxwell’s TerraMar Project, which officially supported UN Sustainable Development Goals as they relate the world’s oceans, made a $1.25 million commitment to the Clinton Global Initiative as part of an effort to form a Sustainable Oceans Alliance. TerraMar shut down shortly after Epstein’s 2019 arrest.

Isabel Maxwell and Al Seckel at the World Economic Forum’s 2011 Annual Meeting

Notably, Ghislaine’s TerraMar Project was in many ways the successor to Isabel Maxwell’s failed Blue World Alliance, which was also ostensibly focused on the world’s oceans. Blue World Alliance was set up by Isabel and her now deceased husband Al Seckel, who had hosted a “scientific conference” on Epstein’s island. The Blue World Alliance also went under the name Globalsolver Foundation, and Xavier Malina, Christine Maxwell’s son, was listed as Globalsolver’s liaison to the Clinton Foundation. He was previously an intern at the Clinton Global Initiative.

Malina later worked in the Obama administration at the Office of White House Personnel. He now works for Google. It is also worth noting that during this same period, Isabel Maxwell’s son, Alexander Djerassi, was chief of staff at the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs in the Hillary Clinton–run State Department.

The 2011 meeting at Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan mansion attended by James E. Staley, Larry Summers, Jeffery Epstein, Bill Gates and Boris Nikolic.

In 2014, Nikolic “waxed enthusiastic” about Epstein’s supposed penchant for financial advice ahead of a public offering for a gene-editing company that Nikolic had a $42 million stake in. Notably, both Nikolic and Epstein were clients of the same group of bankers at JP Morgan, with Bloomberg later reporting that Epstein regularly helped those bankers attract wealthy new clients.

In 2016, Nikolic cofounded Biomatics capital, which invests in health-related companies at “the convergence of genomics and digital data” that are “enabling the development of superior therapeutics, diagnostics and delivery models.” Nikolic founded Biomatics with Julie Sunderland, formerly the director of the Gates Foundation’s Strategic Investment Fund.

At least three of the companies backed by BiomaticsQihan BiotecheGenesis, and Editas—were cofounded by George Church, a Harvard geneticist with deep ties to Epstein and also closely associated with the Edge Foundation. Biomatics investment in Qihan Biotech is no longer listed on the Biomatics website. Church’s Qihan Biotech seeks to produce human tissues and organs inside pigs for transplantation into humans, while eGenesis seeks to genetically modify pig organs for use in humans. Editas produces CRISPR gene-editing “medicines” and is also backed by the Gates Foundation as well as Google Ventures.

Church has been accused of promoting eugenics as well as unethical human experimentation. Epstein’s significant interest in eugenics was made public after his death, and Bill Gates, as well as his father William H. Gates II, have also been linked to eugenics movements and ideas.

My recommendation read the hole Articel.

The Trump-Epstein-Gates-WEF-Connection Melanie Walker and her great Idea in 2016 into Davos https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/healthcare-in-2030-goodbye-hospital-hello-home-spital/

Never Again! Is Now!

Launching the Decade of Vaccineshttps://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2010/12/Global-Health-Leaders-Launch-Decade-of-Vaccines-Collaboration

Event 201 https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/

Event 201 Explained in Detailhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoLw-Q8X174&feature=youtu.be&t=493

Mayors Challengehttps://www.bloomberg.org/program/government-innovation/mayors-challenge/

Implementing a National COVID-19 Testing Action Planhttps://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/TheRockefellerFoundation_WhitePaper_Covid19_4_22_2020.pdf

Implementing a Digital Immunity Certificate https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=23&v=LsNfyzuDvQ0&feature=emb_title

Implementing the COVI-Passhttps://covipass.com/

Implementing the “Trust Stamp” Vaccine Record and Payment System https://citizentruth.org/africa-to-become-testing-ground-for-trust-stamp-vaccine-record-and-payment-system/

Efficiently delivering vaccines to millions of children, tracking identity and immunisation records in a digitised manner and incentivising the delivery of vaccineshttps://www.gavi.org/investing-gavi/funding/donor-profiles/mastercard

Healthy people should wear masks only if caring for coronavirus patients, WHO sayshttps://nypost.com/2020/05/28/healthy-people-should-wear-masks-only-if-caring-for-coronavirus-patients-who-says/?fbclid=IwAR3xxJeYcTnI7OJTrqIskeP1rd31fUTbLac9–BWqrv3J_M0Tkwb9hws8KY

Why “We need to develop genetic engineering technologies and techniques (mRNA software)to be able to write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology the same way in which we write a software and program computers.” Execute Order. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/09/12/executive-order-on-advancing-biotechnology-and-biomanufacturing-innovation-for-a-sustainable-safe-and-secure-american-bioeconomy/

Antony Fauci Testimony https://web.archive.org/web/20200207225943/https://science.house.gov/imo/media/doc/Fauci%20Testimony.pdf

Cardiac side effects of RNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: Hidden cardiotoxic effects of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 on ventricular myocyte function and structure https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.16262

Italian study on vaccine effectiveness (VE) in kids reports effectiveness dropping to 21% after 43 days. And this is after applying the 14 days miscategorisation trick where the vaccinated are counted as unvaccinated. So in reality VE is much much lower. https://thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)01185-0/fulltext…

See selected coverage on coronavirus pressure:

Wireless Personal Communications (2021)

Nano‐Sensor Modelling for Intra‐Body Nano‐Networks https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08171-2

Techniques of EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification and applications https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1455479/

INHALATION EXPOSURE TO CARBON NANOTUBES (CNT) AND CARBON NANOFIBERS (CNF): METHODOLOGY AND DOSIMETRY – PMC

https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1119251

https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y.pdf?pdf=button%20sticky

COVID Vax Ingredients Exposed: Graphene, Nanometals, PEG and Parasites Platelets and hemostatic proteins are co-localized with chronic neuroinflammation surrounding implanted intracortical microelectrodes – PubMed

https://patents.google.com/patent/CA2028849A1/en

Nanobills S. 189 AN ACT authorize appropriations for nanoscience, nanoengineering, and nanotechnology research, and for other pur- poses.

Magnetic soft robotics to manipulate the extracellular matrix in vitro – PubMed

256. M.C. McAlpine, R.S. Friedman and C.M. Lieber, „High-Performance Nanowire Electronics and Photonics and Nanoscale Patterning on Flexible Plastic Substrates,“ Proc. IEEE. Accepted for publication.

255. R. Agarwal, C.J. Barrelet and C.M. Lieber, „Lasing in Single Cadmium Sulfide Nanowire Optical Cavities,“ Nano Lett. Accepted for publication. [download pdf]

254. R.S. Friedman, M.C. McAlpine, D.S. Ricketts, D. Ham and C.M. Lieber, „High-speed integrated nanowire circuits,“ Nature 434, 1085 (2005). [download pdf]

253. F. Patolsky and C.M. Lieber, „Nanowire nanosensors,“ Materials Today 8, 20-28 (2005). [download pdf]

252. W.U. Wang, C. Chen, K. Lin, Y. Fang and C.M. Lieber, „Label-free detection of small-molecule-protein interactions by using nanowire nanosensors,“ Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3208-3212 (2005). [download pdf]

251. Y. Huang, X. Duan and C.M. Lieber, „Nanowires for Integrated Multicolor Nanophotonics,“ Small 1, 142-147 (2005). [download pdf]

US Firm Integrates Nanotechnology, Blockchain For Covid-19 Immunity Passports!

Archer Materials demonstrates multiplexing readout for its Biochip gFET

https://www.graphene-info.com/archer-materials-demonstrates-multiplexing-readout-its-biochip-gfet

QUANTUM DOTS „PCR“ „TESTS“

https://open.substack.com/pub/outraged/p/quantum-dots-pcr-tests?r=1pk0jl&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

https://www.theverge.com/2020/4/21/21230453/palantir-coronavirus-trump-contract-peter-thiel-tracking-hhs-protect-now

The common enemy isn’t a virus… It’s critical thinkers like YOU and me who do NOT believe their children or their bodies belong to a global government for their perverted experimentation, enslavement, or execution.

James Roguski It’s Time To YELL At The U.S. GovernmentWORLDWIDE PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED “PANDEMIC AGREEMENT” HAVE BEEN REQUESTED BY THE UNITED STATES OFFICE FOR GLOBAL AFFAIRS PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO BELOW…Read more2 days ago · 137 likes · 89 comments · James Roguski

Subscribe to James Roguski’s SubStack to learn how to notify government leaders that you demand that our nation exit the WHO.

OTHER REPORTS YOU MAY BE INTEREST IN

UNLOCKED: Spike Proteins and Lipid Nanoparticles are HIGHLY TOXIC per Systemic Review of Scientific Literature

·

18. JAN.

UNLOCKED: Spike Proteins and Lipid Nanoparticles are HIGHLY TOXIC per Systemic Review of Scientific Literature

Read full story

Surgeon General Ladapo Calls to Stop the Use of mRNA Vaccines in Human Beings

KAREN KINGSTON

4. JAN.

Surgeon General Ladapo Calls to Stop the Use of mRNA Vaccines in Human Beings

January 3, 2024: “It’s a felony to lie about a drug and it’s a felony to make money off of a drug you know you lied about and it’s a felony to conspire with others to make money off a drug you all lied about together.” When the FDA and Big Pharma Conspire to Manipulate, Confuse, and Lie to the American People – the Outcomes Are Catastrophic

Read full story

The Scientific Formula that Guarantees People Will Voluntarily Give Up their Freedom

KAREN KINGSTON

·

29. NOVEMBER 2023

The Scientific Formula that Guarantees People Will Voluntarily Give Up their Freedom

November 29, 2023: Why did Americans surrender their freedoms so easily? Why did we agree to submit ourselves and our children to house arrest and the psychological and emotional abuse that comes along with isolation? Why did we agree to cover our faces and our

Read full story

„Hacking the Future“ the Rockefeller Plan to Lockdown the World

Rockefeller-Foundation-1.pdf

The Scenario Framework

The Rockefeller Foundation and GBN began the scenario process by surfacing a host of driving forces that would affect the future of technology and international development. These forces were generated through both secondary research and in-depth interviews with Foundation staff, Foundation grantees, and external experts.

This report builds on the Rockefeller Foundation’s growing body of work in the emerging field of pro-poor foresight. In 2009, the Institute for Alternative Futures published the report Foresight for Smart Globalization: Accelerating and Enhancing Pro-Poor Development Opportunities, with support from the Rockefeller Foundation. That effort was a reflection of the Foundation’s strong commitment to exploring innovative processes and embracing new pathways for insight aimed at helping the world’s poor. With this report, the Foundation takes a further step in advancing the field of pro-poor foresight, this time through the lens of scenario planning.

WHY SCENARIOS?
The goal of this project was not to affirm what is already known and knowable about what
is happening right now at the intersections of technology and development. Rather, it was to explore the many ways in which technology and development could co-evolve—could both push and inhibit each other—in the future, and then to begin to examine what those possible alternative paths may imply for the world’s poor and vulnerable populations. Such an exercise required project participants to push their thinking far beyond the status quo, into uncharted territory.

A Note on Terminology

The Foundation’s work promotes “resilience and equitable growth.” Resilience refers to the capacity of individuals, communities, and systems to survive, adapt, and grow in the face of changes, even catastrophic incidents. Equitable growth involves enabling individuals, communities, and institutions to access new tools, practices, resources, services, and products.

THE SCENARIO NARRATIVES
The scenarios that follow are not meant to be exhaustive—rather, they are designed to be both plausible and provocative, to engage your imagination while also raising new questions for you about what that future might look and feel like. Each scenario tells a story of how the world, and in particular the developing world, might progress over the next 15 to 20 years, with an emphasis on those elements relating
to the use of different technologies and the interaction of these technologies with the lives of the poor and vulnerable. Accompanying each scenario is a range of elements that aspire to further illuminate life, technology, and philanthropy in that world. These include:

  • A timeline of possible headlines and emblematic events unfolding during the period of the scenario
  • Short descriptions of what technologies and technology trends we might see
  • Initial observations on the changing role of philanthropy in that world, highlighting opportunities and challenges that philanthropic organizations would face and what their operating environment might be like
  • A “day in the life” sketch of a person living and working in that world

Please keep in mind that the scenarios in
this report are stories, not forecasts, and
the plausibility of a scenario does not hinge
on the occurrence of any particular detail.
In the scenario titled “Clever Together,” for example, “a consortium of nations, NGOs [non- governmental organizations], and companies establish the Global Technology Assessment Office”—a detail meant to symbolize how a high degree of international coordination and adaptation might lead to the formation of a body that anticipates technology’s potential societal implications. That detail, along with dozens of others in each scenario, is there to give you a more tangible “feel” for the world described in the scenario. Please consider names, dates, and other such specifics in each scenario as proxies for types of events, not as necessary conditions for any particular scenario to unfold.
We now invite you to immerse yourself in each future world and consider four different visions for the evolution of technology and international development to 2030.

The Nazi symbiosis: politics and human die genetics at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute

Thomas M Berez et al. Endeavour. 2004 Dec.Show details   Abstract    PubMed    PMID  Full text linksCite

Abstract

The case of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics (KWIA), from its inception in Weimar Republic Germany to its apogee under the rule of the Third Reich, is an example of how politics and human heredity can function as mutually beneficial resources. Whether it was a result of the Nazi bureaucrats‘ desire to legitimize their racial policy through science, or the KWIA personnel’s desire to secure more funding for their research, the symbiotic relationship that developed between human genetics and Nazi politics could help explain why many scientists in the Third Reich undertook research projects that wholly transgressed the boundaries of morally acceptable science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Erstelle eine Website wie diese mit WordPress.com
Jetzt starten